James Bond producers defend Quantum of Solace

James Bond producers defend wrong series entry Quantum of Solace. The direct successor to the 2006s Casino Royale found Daniel Craigs 007 out of revenge after the death of his lover Vesper Lynd.

Unfortunately while Casino Royale was almost universally praised, Quantum of Solace found itself beaten by both critics and Bond fans, and is now the consensus choice for the worst film of the Craig era by Bond. In fact, Craig himself recently told of the disappointing Casino Royale follow-up and calls the process of making it a “s – vis. “Fortunately, the Bond series would recover with the critically acclaimed blockbuster Skyfall, followed by the financially successful Ghost.

Quantum of Solace may be something of a black sheep among James Bond films from the Craig era, but not everyone shows up to bash the film. In fact, Bond producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson recently spoke out in defense of the work, explaining /Movie why they think the film is an important one in the development of Craig’s Bond portrayal. Broccoli said:

“I’m really proud of the film. I think it’s part of the whole evolution of Bond. And I think that after ‘Casino Royale’, when he closed emotionally, the next step was to go out. on revenge.I think the story of that movie is that revenge is an empty challenge.You do not get any benefit from revenge.So I think it’s important in the whole story of this character’s development.I’m definitely very proud of it. “

Unfortunately for Broccoli the intended meaning of Quantum of Solace may have been lost in the middle of the so-called “s-tshow” movie eventually became. A catalog of exactly what went wrong Casino Royale follow-up, of course, starts with the unfortunate fact that the film went in front of cameras without a polished script due to the author’s strike at the time. Fans have also pointed to the film’s revenge angle as a problem – despite the fact that Wilson and Broccoli apparently thought the revenge plot was actually a good idea. Another topic that pops up in discussions about Quantum of Solace is that Mathieu Amalric’s villain is a weakling compared to other Bond villains. It can also be argued that Marc Forster was a poor choice to direct the film, especially after Martin Campbell did such a solid job on Casino Royale.

It is also interesting that after Quantum of Solace The Bond franchise underwent several adjustments, including Sam Mende’s arrival to direct Skyfall, and in Ghost the introduction of a tweaked version of the classic Bond villain Blofeld. So it is clear that while Broccoli and Wilson personally could have wanted the direction things were taken Quantum of Solace, they also recognized the need to change course in subsequent films. Which just goes to show that the managers of the Bond franchise are very smart when it comes to reading the audience’s reaction and making the necessary changes. And thanks to these adjustments, the Bond series was able to build up to the great climax promised in the upcoming version No time to die. So Quantum of Solace may be a black sheep among Bond films, but its failure at least taught producers some valuable lessons they could use later, which made the Bond series generally better.

Leave a Comment