The book about Boba Fett points to a prequel issue at Disney’s Star wars universe. Boba Fett returns Mandalorianeren, season 2 was well received and the bounty hunter’s upcoming spinoff is highly anticipated. While it promises to be an exciting journey for a fan favorite, the show becomes part of a bigger issue when viewed alongside the rest of Disney Star wars slate.
Between The book about Boba Fett, The Mandalorian season 3, and Ahsoka, Disney is rapidly creating and rushing an era of “prequel-to-the sequels”. It has been wildly successful so far, and gets it in many ways Star wars right. As can be seen from Ahsoka and Fat’s appearances in The Mandalorian season 2, these shows also promise to relate to each other. While these “prequel” offerings are likely to be received more favorably than George Lucas’ prequel films, this Disney era may be just as dubious – for more problematic reasons.
Disney’s sequel trilogy featured a star thrower and had bright moments, but is otherwise largely considered a disorganized, poorly planned mess. In light of that, Disney should either focus on tales set after the Skywalker Saga or build on the story of the sequel trilogy in a meaningful, conscious way. Without them, Disney’s focus on the immediate post-The return of Jedi era seems to be an attempt to quickly fix some of the sequel trilogy’s strangest plot holes (such as Supreme Leader Snoke’s clone origins) and delight disappointed fans. If so, it’s worth wondering if Disney is Star wars is heading into creative decay.
That’s right The Mandalorian connects to the sequel trilogy in a few ways, and it probably is The book about Boba Fett and Ahsoka also find ways to do it. For these shows to really help redeem the sequel trilogy, they need to connect in a way that provides narrative, not just logical continuity. George Lucas’ prequels filled the universe of the original trilogy, but did so to tell the tragic story of Anakin Skywalker, not to solve plot problems. This is far from how The Mandalorian fills tangentially gaps in subsequent trilogy logic, as well as its hasty set-up of Force healing to explain how Rey and Kylo Ren can force healing into Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker, and its glimpse of the empire’s first attempt at cloning. These revelations make holes in the sequel trilogy, but do not make them any more interesting when a series or movie about Kylo Ren abandons his Jedi training to First Order.
If post-Jedi shows do not add depth to the sequel trilogy, they must plant seeds for a timeline after Skywalker Saga to avoid being simple fan service. Though The Book of Boba Fett, The Mandalorian, and Ahsoka connect with each other, the stakes will feel lower and lower if the audience realizes that each story is irrelevant by Star Wars: The Force Awakens. Even though Ahsoka, promising to reintroduce both the Jedi (including Ezra Bridger) and a brilliant post-villainROTJ timeline, is unlikely to affect a subsequent trilogy galaxy – Ahsoka himself is thought to have died of Rise of Skywalker, and her likely opponent Grand Admiral Thrawn is completely absent from the trilogy.
It is also clear that Disney has hesitated to commit to a subsequent trilogy rig. Star Wars: Visions has proven the potential of the era by touching on the Power, lightsaber and Jedi’s future. However, it is not canon, which further suggests that Disney is afraid to take the saga in a new direction. Lucasfilm’s upcoming shows will surely delight audiences. Without a larger plan, however, they can simply be safe games and an appeal to nostalgia. Hopefully, The book about Boba Fett will use the iconic character to grow the franchise in a meaningful way.